Most people who know me well also know that for a few years
I have been obsessed with board games. I
guess “obsessed” is the right word. I
spend a lot of time thinking about them, reading about them, listening to podcasts
about them, and watching videos.
I can trace my history in this. I remember, when I was about ten or eleven
years old, asking my parents for a strategy game for Christmas. I got Stratego, which I enjoyed. Shortly
after that, I discovered Dungeons and Dragons, though my friends and I played
with a very skewed, watered-down version of the rules that we made up in lieu
of reading and understanding the real rules.
After that, RPGs remained my mainstay in the gaming department until I
was about 30. After that, due to time
constraints (both on my part, and my friends’), I started moving back into more
and more board games and card games.
But why? That is
harder for me to figure out. What do I
find so attractive about games? And why
do I like certain games more than others?
There are numerous reasons, but a new one that occurred to
me recently is the concrete nature of the rules of the situation the game
creates. A game creates a little world
(which, within the theme of the game, might be something abstract and geometric
like alternating checkered squares, or it might be expansive like an
artistically-rendered galaxy populated by various aliens set on conquering and colonizing
neighboring star systems), but this world functions on a system of rules that
the players know and must work within. I
like this “logic” aspect. I like knowing
“if A, then B;” or “if A, then you must choose from A, B, or C.” The rules might be complex, and not solvable
in the way that tic-tac-toe is solvable, and the choices might be hard, but
there are rules that I can look up and which do not change.
In this regard, I find games a refreshing temporary refuge
from real life. In real life, every
single person is playing by a different set of rules. (It just occurred to me
that maybe this is one of the big attractions of religion. Maybe, on one level, many people like
religion because it makes them feel like other people who share the same faith
are going by the same rule book, and it makes their society more understandable.) I think most people play by similar rules
sets, but they are so complex, inscrutable, and mutable that the rules can
hardly be called rules.
It does occur to me that comparing a game rule book to a
metaphorical “real life” rule book might be sort of forced. It might only be an apt metaphor for someone
like me who spends a lot of time thinking about games.
In that regard, a month ago I took a class pertaining to the
legal bases for government appropriations, and we spent quite a bit of time
skimming through legislation and legal decisions with regard to federal
agencies’ budgets, financial obligations, and expenditures. Half way through the class it started to feel
to me like I was reading a very large game rule book, which prompted me to
think, “When your primary system of thought is game rules, everything looks
like a board game.” This is akin to “When
your only tool is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.” I liked the class much more than I expected
to, perhaps because it seemed so much like a game rule book.
I don’t think this is the primary reason I enjoy board
games, but it’s up there.
Interesting blog, Mark. I've never put much thought into why I do or don't like certain things.
ReplyDelete